While Friedman (2010) wrote his article as an Op-Ed piece the points he highlights are relevant and ring true in today’s America. American’s have seen the rise of escalating focus on the war on terrorism in the past ten years, with billions of dollars dedicated to fighting that war. However, we have not seen the same kind of resources put into the education of our students in the areas of STEM careers. Though the government and many in the scientific community have expressed concern and support for STEM education in light of the lack of qualified applicants for jobs in those fields, the support at the local level has been sparse to say the least. Many science teachers face the unenviable task of teaching science without adequate time, supplies or space. Compounding the problem is the fact that many students do not fully get to experience the level of scientific inquiry that they will need to successfully attempt careers in the STEM fields.
If we are to produce future leaders and innovators in the STEM fields we may need to do more than simply declare that there is a focus on STEM education. We need to work on building the atmosphere that creates those leaders. Friedman (2010) asks the question, “What is our national project going to be? Racing China, chasing Al Qaeda, or parsing Harry?” and our answer to that question is not clear. We hear more about what happens with the war on terror than we do about the fact that America has fallen greatly in its standing in science on the world stage. Many people do not know that China, once the communist pariah of the new age, is now number one in the level of science education provided to students (Ranking America, 2011). How did we lose focus of the prize so quickly? Sputnik was not the last major scientific leap in the last century, however, it has seemingly become the moment by which we defined ourselves. Back then eyebrows would have been raised in criticism if half of our products came out of Russia, but today no one so much as bats an eyelash at the fact that a large number of the products we use are tagged “made in China”. Are we in effect financing China’s rise to the top?
Maybe we need to take a page out of China’s book as far as education is concerned. According to Nicholas Kristof (2011) students in China are introduced to structured education at the age of two, where the focus is on education and not school sports. How often do we see students in our society who show up to school without homework completed or having reviewed for a test because they were at practice for some team sport? Until, and unless we realign our focus to what is important to the greater good of the country we will only continue to fall further from the top of the pack and may face being surpassed by other countries that twenty years ago were not even considered competitors, never mind superiors.
Friedman, T. L. (2010, January 17). What’s our Sputnik? [Op-Ed]. The New York Times [Late Edition (East Coast)], p. WK.8.
Kristof, N. (2011, January 15). China’s winning schools? [Op-Ed]. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/opinion/16kristof.html?_r=1
Ranking America (2011).The U.S. ranks 23rd in PISA science score. Retrieved from http://rankingamerica.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/the-u-s-ranks-23rd-in-pisa-science-score/